engine driven fuel pump flow checks

The place to raise issues, ask questions, swap ideas and discuss anything related to aircraft engineering, maintenance and building.
NB Any opinions expressed in this forum are not necessarily those of LAA Engineering

Moderators: John Dean, Moderator

Post Reply
simpleflying
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:10 am
Location: staffordshire

engine driven fuel pump flow checks

Post by simpleflying » Sat Aug 20, 2011 7:05 pm

The LAA/IC-FF form for carrying out fuel flow checks for first permit to test indicates that both engine driven and electric pumps must be checked. Checking an engine driven pump with the engine at full power seems a hazardous occupation! I seem to remember hearing somewhere that this has been amended on this web site but cannot find any trace. Anyone know anything about this?

mike newall
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: N Yorkshire

Post by mike newall » Sun Aug 21, 2011 12:47 am

The electronic version of the form explains it.

On higher power engines, it is sufficient to check the output of the electric pump without endangering your life with props and petrol 8)

If you have a low power gravity fed system, it may be prudent to check the pump, but with RV's etc - No !

G-AWMN
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:19 pm

Fuel Flow check

Post by G-AWMN » Sun Aug 21, 2011 7:19 pm

I seem also to have read that in some cases this check can be waved but my inspector has insisted that I do a check on my plane prior to flying after a major rebuild as if the pump is faulty we might only find out at 200 feet on the first take off. I completed the test today.

My engine is a VW with an engine driven pump. My inspector agreed that a full throttle run was dangerous and suggested that we do the test at 1500 rpm.

The set up was fitting a simple T piece into the fuel pipe between the pump and carb. To the T another tube was fitted that routed upwards approx. 12" and then backwards and down into a measuring jug. The jug was strapped to a main wheel to stop it blowing away. (Luton Minor) This tube was clamped closed with a small G clamp. The 12" rise or head gives sufficient pressure to keep the engine running. The engine was started and set at 1500 rpm and standing in a position just in front of the main wheel but behind the firewall I was able to reach foward to the G clamp and open this clamp to start drawing fuel. In this position I was clear of the prop even at full reach so relatively safe. A helper had a stop watch and called when 2lt had been collected. This helper avoided me having to move from my almost safe position. The engine was then stopped and the extra pipework removed.

In my case at 1500 rpm it took 3 mins and 6 seconds to draw 2lt of fuel at 1500rpm or 38.7lt above required to keep engine running. Flat out a VW should use about 18lt an hour so I do not think I have a problem.

Only Issue I have is when I send in the paperwork will the LAA be happy with the 1500 rpm test!

Stuart Penfold

simpleflying
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 11:10 am
Location: staffordshire

Post by simpleflying » Sun Aug 21, 2011 7:51 pm

thanks Mike and Stuart. Mine is an RV6 so a bit of a beast so glad not to do it!
Neil Rawlinson

rans6andrew
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:39 pm

Post by rans6andrew » Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:52 pm

funny train of thought!

if you take the pipe from the T piece upwards for 12 inches that may well create a "head" of pressure but the moment you feed it back down the head will be reduced. By the time it gets down to the level of your undercarriage leg the pipe will be sucking (syphoning) from the T piece and creating a negative head. Luckily the restriction caused by the clamp will cause a backpressure. You really ought to have a fuel pressure gauge, at the same height as the carb fuel inlet pipe, to ensure that the minimum pressure needed by the carb is maintained while the measured drain off is being taken.

Rans6....
Andrew Cattell

Rans S6 Microlight.

User avatar
mikehallam
Posts: 576
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:12 pm
Location: West Sussex
Contact:

Post by mikehallam » Mon Aug 22, 2011 9:17 pm

It might be nonsense, but if e.g the pump is adequate at mid rev's, you can't be sure it/the whole fuel feed system won't cavitate or perhaps not function at double the capacity, or even meet the 1500 rpm output when running at t/off & climb rev's !!

mike.

BTW. The poor old 'plane every single take off is at WOT and at first static, as that doesn't bother the P1, I think that one ought to consider test P1 sitting in a/c, stick back, brakes full on and chocked.
[Perhaps if the plane might pull onto the nose a scew in stake and rope to the tail skid too ?]
Jug taped to something firm and give it the same rev's that you want it to work on - and provide plenty of fuel.

paul330
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:37 am
Location: White River, South Africa

Post by paul330 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:55 am

I had recently been checking this out and as I understood the requirements, only an electric pump check is required on bigger fuel injected engines. I believe you are more checking that the pipe work, filters etc are not blocked with insects/dead rats rather than the efficiency of the pumps.
Paul Marskell
RV-10 ZU-IIZ
At Mercy Air, White River, RSA

Bearhawk Bravo QB under construction

Rob Swain
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:11 pm

Post by Rob Swain » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:55 pm

mikehallam wrote: I think that one ought to consider test P1 sitting in a/c, stick back, brakes full on and chocked.
Last time I tried something like this I tied the tailwheel to the hangar with some stout rope!
Rob Swain
If the good Lord had intended man to fly, He would have given him more money.

Post Reply