Rotax 912/914 Bulletin re rpm's & 'overloading'.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:23 pm
I see from the Bulletin issued last week by Rotax that for their four strokes engine full power rev's less than 5,200 rpm must be avoided.
REF: New Rotax Service letter for the 912 & 914 series engines.
SL-912-016 page 4/6 sub point 3.1.2)
"Take off RPM at WOT should not be below 5,200 rpm to avoid overloading the engine."
This requirement rather worried me as I get only approx. 5,000/5,100 indicated rpm.
However Francis D. in the Eurostar review in the Oct. LAA magazine mentions a significantly lower & thus contrary 4,700 at take off & wide open throttle.
So how are we to interpret the situation on our own a/c ?
Especially as this aircraft was built by Conrad Beale the U.K. Rotax distributor. who we assume is bang up to date,
e.g. "I've has always run below 5,200 in the take-off and climb out, so I can safely ignore Rotax ? [Hardly]
Or, Let's fine up the prop to get the specified minimum of 5,200 and then risk overspeeding when flat out, Straight & Level ?
Mike Hallam.
REF: New Rotax Service letter for the 912 & 914 series engines.
SL-912-016 page 4/6 sub point 3.1.2)
"Take off RPM at WOT should not be below 5,200 rpm to avoid overloading the engine."
This requirement rather worried me as I get only approx. 5,000/5,100 indicated rpm.
However Francis D. in the Eurostar review in the Oct. LAA magazine mentions a significantly lower & thus contrary 4,700 at take off & wide open throttle.
So how are we to interpret the situation on our own a/c ?
Especially as this aircraft was built by Conrad Beale the U.K. Rotax distributor. who we assume is bang up to date,
e.g. "I've has always run below 5,200 in the take-off and climb out, so I can safely ignore Rotax ? [Hardly]
Or, Let's fine up the prop to get the specified minimum of 5,200 and then risk overspeeding when flat out, Straight & Level ?
Mike Hallam.