Small Engines Competition.
Moderators: John Dean, Moderator
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm
- Location: Caithness
Small Engines Competition.
Anyone heard anything on the grapevine of any serious contenders for the above challenge set in place by our association.
-
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:28 pm
- Location: Sheerness Kent
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:47 pm
Ford's new 1Litre motor is tiny and frugal. a three cylinder turbo Diesel, it develops 100HP. Derated to, say 75, I wonder what it weighs?
The whole car costs less than a Rotax.
But consider the noise test and gaining approval, particularly for the electronics which most people don't trust (mistakenly) in their cars. The amount of time and money spent constructing an engine that will make your asset unsaleable versus the price of a Rotax.
That is why the idea is unfortunately a non starter.
The whole car costs less than a Rotax.
But consider the noise test and gaining approval, particularly for the electronics which most people don't trust (mistakenly) in their cars. The amount of time and money spent constructing an engine that will make your asset unsaleable versus the price of a Rotax.
That is why the idea is unfortunately a non starter.
- mikehallam
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: West Sussex
- Contact:
I'd not heard of it but Google helped. It's claimed thus, see last para (ex Wikipedia).
The more powerful engine's block is CI and it's said to fit on an A4 size plan, but the photo - not allowed here - shows a very tall unit, which is mostly of course all to one side of the crankshaft. So potentially heavy (?) & dimensionally difficult to fit into a two seat conventional tractor a/c.
On the other hand the description might indicate the smaller powered version has a lighter (Ali ?) block.
Putting on a mechanically secure propeller reduction drive will add cost, mass, size and engineering time.
It has a 'Timing belt' curious, as it runs in oil, so I'd hope they mean 'chain', otherwise a No-No.
As described its power curve is praised for its flat torque - perhaps the valve operation profile as well as the electronics would need attention for an a/c where prop demand rises at the third power of rpm.
mike hallam.
[color=darkblue]Production is to start in April 2012. The 1.0 comes initially in two versions: 74 kW (101 PS) and 88 to 92 kW (120 to 125 PS). The more powerful version delivers a maximum of 170 N·m (125 lb·ft) from 1,300–4,500 rpm and 200 N·m (148 lb·ft) on overboost, which makes for a broad torque curve when compared to on-road diesel engines. The engine block is cast iron instead of aluminium for up to 50% faster warm-up.[10][11] Due to natural vibrations of a 3-cylinder design, the flywheel has been deliberately unbalanced to ensure smooth running, without the use of energy sapping balancer shafts. The engine also features an internal timing belt, bathed in the engine oil, for long life and greater efficiency. The exhaust manifold is cast into the cylinder head, reducing warm up times and therefore further aiding efficiency. All this is packaged in an engine block the size of an A4 sheet of paper. [12] The engines are produced in Köln, Germany[/color]
The more powerful engine's block is CI and it's said to fit on an A4 size plan, but the photo - not allowed here - shows a very tall unit, which is mostly of course all to one side of the crankshaft. So potentially heavy (?) & dimensionally difficult to fit into a two seat conventional tractor a/c.
On the other hand the description might indicate the smaller powered version has a lighter (Ali ?) block.
Putting on a mechanically secure propeller reduction drive will add cost, mass, size and engineering time.
It has a 'Timing belt' curious, as it runs in oil, so I'd hope they mean 'chain', otherwise a No-No.
As described its power curve is praised for its flat torque - perhaps the valve operation profile as well as the electronics would need attention for an a/c where prop demand rises at the third power of rpm.
mike hallam.
[color=darkblue]Production is to start in April 2012. The 1.0 comes initially in two versions: 74 kW (101 PS) and 88 to 92 kW (120 to 125 PS). The more powerful version delivers a maximum of 170 N·m (125 lb·ft) from 1,300–4,500 rpm and 200 N·m (148 lb·ft) on overboost, which makes for a broad torque curve when compared to on-road diesel engines. The engine block is cast iron instead of aluminium for up to 50% faster warm-up.[10][11] Due to natural vibrations of a 3-cylinder design, the flywheel has been deliberately unbalanced to ensure smooth running, without the use of energy sapping balancer shafts. The engine also features an internal timing belt, bathed in the engine oil, for long life and greater efficiency. The exhaust manifold is cast into the cylinder head, reducing warm up times and therefore further aiding efficiency. All this is packaged in an engine block the size of an A4 sheet of paper. [12] The engines are produced in Köln, Germany[/color]
-
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:21 pm
The problem with this competition, and to a lesser degree the SSDR one, is that to make it available to others, you must have some idea of what you are doing, perhaps it is your profession (or a side-line of).
The days of being able to pick up some bits at the scrapyard and tinker away in the garage have long gone.
On top of the design skills you need to have a machine workshop (or access to one at a fair cost). Then for engine you will need a auto sparky/computer expert to do all the electrickery.
Regarding the Ford engine, if the unbalanced flywheel is required to offset the 3 cylinders, how do you manage that with a prop replacing the flywheel, Single blade or chop one off a three blade prop? Or just keep the flywheel. IIRC there is someone on one of UK flying forums who knows details about this engine. How does one get hold of one to play with?
The days of being able to pick up some bits at the scrapyard and tinker away in the garage have long gone.
On top of the design skills you need to have a machine workshop (or access to one at a fair cost). Then for engine you will need a auto sparky/computer expert to do all the electrickery.
Regarding the Ford engine, if the unbalanced flywheel is required to offset the 3 cylinders, how do you manage that with a prop replacing the flywheel, Single blade or chop one off a three blade prop? Or just keep the flywheel. IIRC there is someone on one of UK flying forums who knows details about this engine. How does one get hold of one to play with?
It is hard for most people with the necessary skills to get time to think about this when we are digging our way through a recession.
That's a real shame, but if you look around there are some engines being developed based on the Toyota Aygo (aka Citroen/Peugeot) 3-Cylinder engine such as Ecoyota that offer inspiration.
This is interesting: http://aviongazaile44.wifeo.com/motorisation.php
That's a real shame, but if you look around there are some engines being developed based on the Toyota Aygo (aka Citroen/Peugeot) 3-Cylinder engine such as Ecoyota that offer inspiration.
This is interesting: http://aviongazaile44.wifeo.com/motorisation.php
018841
Colin Cheese
Colin Cheese
-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: Oxford
- Contact:
Anyone tinkering with bike engines?
They seem popular elsewhere in the world. The only one I know of that is used here in the UK is a BMW flat twin, but I've heard conflicting reports with regard to the level of success encountered.
They seem popular elsewhere in the world. The only one I know of that is used here in the UK is a BMW flat twin, but I've heard conflicting reports with regard to the level of success encountered.
Rob Swain
If the good Lord had intended man to fly, He would have given him more money.
If the good Lord had intended man to fly, He would have given him more money.
-
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:47 pm
Bike engines tend to be high revving and comparatively short on torque these days. They don't seem to last long either. You would need to create a crankcase without the integral clutch and gearbox so it all looks too much like hard work. The BMW engine is reliable but heavy due to its massive crank although a 40 HP flat twin would be ideal for me. Half a D-motor would probably work but with the market, even in microlights heading resolutely towards 100HP/100KT airframes, it would seem to be unlikely that anybody is going to bother, alas.
-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: Oxford
- Contact:
You don't hear much this side of the Channel about 2CV/Visa engine conversions. There's a pretty little German motorglider, the ULF-2 (http://www.eel.de/english/ulf-2_description.htm#), the plans for which include a Visa conversion. (Don't know what the engine weighs though.)
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm
- Location: Caithness
-
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: Oxford
- Contact:
Yes, now you mention it I think that the Citroen option was a fair bit heavier than the B&S (...just found the article: 17kg heavier). However, there appears to be a healthy modifying community, and 40 kg/40hp has been mentioned. This would pitch it into half-VW territory, would it not?
Hmm, as I'm currently in Italy, I'm now wondering what the weights/powers of the original Fiat 500 engine are. Abarth-powered microlight, anyone?
Hmm, as I'm currently in Italy, I'm now wondering what the weights/powers of the original Fiat 500 engine are. Abarth-powered microlight, anyone?
-
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:21 pm
I just had a flash back and remembered there was a Citroen Visa aero engine conversion. Allegedy a better option than the 2CV. May also be easier to find in the UK.
http://www.lightsportaircraftpilot.com/ ... index.html
http://www.lightsportaircraftpilot.com/ ... index.html
-
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:28 pm
- Location: Sheerness Kent
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:43 pm