New Fabric Aircraft Covering
Moderators: John Dean, Moderator
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:13 pm
- Location: Nottinghamshire
There was a sub-115kg aircraft on the Escapade stand at SPLASH last weekend, covered with the fabric. It's about 1/2 the finished weight of Stits (no need to paint or dope etc), and twice the price for the fabric, so handy if you can't spray paint in your workshop. Said to be excellent at resisting UV light. It looked OK.
Obviously in the Kid Escapade the lightness takes priority, but I imagine against a professional paint job, it might work out no more expenseive than using the traditional stuff.
I suggest you ask the Escapade people at Old Sarum for info and their opinion on it.
Obviously in the Kid Escapade the lightness takes priority, but I imagine against a professional paint job, it might work out no more expenseive than using the traditional stuff.
I suggest you ask the Escapade people at Old Sarum for info and their opinion on it.
032505
-
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:28 pm
- Location: Sheerness Kent
Hi Paul. Francis has the samples you gave me at Splash and is enthusiastic about the product. Personally I thought the standard of finished fabric on both the Kid and the tail surfaces of the Sherwood Ranger was very good. It's a very traditional 'silk' finish, so may not suit those who want a wet gloss look. It will be interesting to see how the painted fabric looks, though from what you said at the show that too will be a silk look rather than a gloss.
-
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:21 pm
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm
- Location: Caithness
Looks as though Oratex might suit my project and I'll bear it in mind when the time comes for covering.
The non-gloss finish would be more suitable, anyway, for my aircraft. The instructions don't have a lot to say about wood airframes and the method shown for covering (tailplane) flying surfaces shows a 630 degree wrap around for the leading edges, which would be rather awkward. Maybe this would not be needed for a wooden airframe?
It would be interesting to know roughly how the finished cost of using Oratex compares with using conventional materials/techniques.
The weight savings alone would be very attractive!
The non-gloss finish would be more suitable, anyway, for my aircraft. The instructions don't have a lot to say about wood airframes and the method shown for covering (tailplane) flying surfaces shows a 630 degree wrap around for the leading edges, which would be rather awkward. Maybe this would not be needed for a wooden airframe?
It would be interesting to know roughly how the finished cost of using Oratex compares with using conventional materials/techniques.
The weight savings alone would be very attractive!
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:49 pm
- mikehallam
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:12 pm
- Location: West Sussex
- Contact: