Makes you wonder how it used to be.(from the London Times)

Come on in for general chat and POLITE banter between LAA members

Moderators: John Dean, Moderator

mike newall
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: N Yorkshire

Post by mike newall » Fri Dec 25, 2009 12:26 pm

______
Paul Hendry-Smith

If you're faced with a forced landing, fly the thing as far into the crash as possible.


And if they fly 2 strokes, I guess they are all experts at the above !

Gave a talk to a strut years ago about the Coaching Scheme - asked if anyone had had a forced landing and a small gaggle put their hands up............

Do you fly Microlights? I asked

We stopped laughing about 20 mins later after lots of tall stories :D

merlin
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:02 pm

Post by merlin » Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:26 pm

Chap up our way just lost his plane (pilot OK) in a forced landing - VW pwr. another with a 912 and the twin off Blackpool had Lycomings.

When I first flew a 2 stroker the instructor told me to expect it to fail one day and fly accordingly. Wise words indeed.
roger breckell

mike newall
Posts: 332
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:56 pm
Location: N Yorkshire

Post by mike newall » Sat Dec 26, 2009 7:04 pm

No - neither - I was just surprised at the little group who raised their hands and then they educated us all on forced landings !

David Hardaker
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:18 pm
Location: Yorkshire

When it goes lumpy

Post by David Hardaker » Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:14 pm

Mike
Don't feel too smug behind a 4-stroke ! (that's an engine where one stroke is to develop power, and the other three are devoted to wearing the engine out !) (not my words)
I've had 2 unscheduled landings, both courtesy of 4-stroke power.
And nearly a third one courtesy of a Rotax 582 that went distinctly off-song but let me get home with partial power.
:!:

Bill McCarthy
Posts: 488
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm
Location: Caithness

Post by Bill McCarthy » Sat Dec 26, 2009 9:39 pm

If there is one thing that gets my goat, that is those who judge a persons character by the newspaper they read - especially with reference to the "Daily Mail", with boring regularity - and not in jest. Do they recoil from one if they find one on an empty seat on a train lest they get contaminated. It looks like it's coming to it that "The Tatler" is the only suitable periodical to be read by aviators.

Dave Hall
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:07 am
Location: Nr Bristol
Contact:

Post by Dave Hall » Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:55 pm

Most super-active forums (fora ?) seem to be populated with a good dose of argumentative bigots who feed each others prejudices until steam comes from their ears.

I can do without that, so rather enjoy the peace and quiet on here. :wink:
032505

Norfolkjohn
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:49 pm
Location: 9 Miles North of EGSH

Post by Norfolkjohn » Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:12 pm

I can only echo Dave Hall’s comments.

Paul, with due respect, your comment :

“There seems to be a subtle level of snobbery associated with flying on this site that I don't find on other sites”

would, IMHO, be a pretty accurate description of the Flyer Forum and I’m astounded you feel that the LAA forum is somehow less friendly and constructive.

I have to say quite honestly that some of the comments I’ve seen on the Flyer Forum recently have left me wondering why I’m still involved with GA. I find the LAA (and BMAA) forums are a breath of fresh air by comparison.
John Allan

Post Reply