Royal Patronage

Come on in for general chat and POLITE banter between LAA members

Moderators: John Dean, Moderator

Post Reply
thickmick
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:38 pm

Royal Patronage

Post by thickmick » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:13 pm

What a load of guff !
Does anyone else have an opinion !

User avatar
Bob F
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:13 pm
Location: Cheshire

Post by Bob F » Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:17 pm

Have I missed something?
Bob Farrell
036981

Ian Melville
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:21 pm

Post by Ian Melville » Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:36 pm

Intresting first post

Queens Speech?

Bill Scott
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:25 pm

Post by Bill Scott » Fri Dec 24, 2010 11:13 pm

Menu to left of page: 'About the LAA'
"Our history dates back to 1946, originally as the Ultralight Aircraft Association and more latterly the Popular Flying Association, and we are proud to have His Royal Highness, Prince Michael of Kent as patron."

Nigel Ramsay
Posts: 298
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: Middle Earth

Post by Nigel Ramsay » Sat Dec 25, 2010 11:58 am

My my, this will be an interesting thread! Happy Christmas guys and gals!

G.Dawes
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:00 am

Post by G.Dawes » Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:29 pm

??? que!

John Brady
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:39 pm

Royal Patronage

Post by John Brady » Thu Dec 30, 2010 6:54 pm

An interesting question this; an Oxbridge interview question perhaps? Does anyone have an opinion - is no opinion an opinion and does the null opinion set therefore exist? Discuss.

HRH Prince Michael is a great patron - the year before last when he came to the LAA shuttleworth bash it was interesting to see that the main men (and women) that we invited to see the LAA all turned up. People like the chairman of the CAA and the director general civil aircraft at DfT. The impact of this social contact on our mission is incredible and could not be bought at any price or by any amount of hard work. And it was good fun to boot.

I had the privilege of escorting HRH through the exhibition and along the flight line after lunch (more than 3 minutes notice of that would have been good but there you are). He knew a lot about historic aeroplanes , had a personal connection with many of them and had driven many of the historic cars. He met LAA people with their aeroplanes and was able to talk about technical stuff. He knew more about most things than I did.

He arrived and left by LAA Air courtesy of Robin Rotherwick.

So is Royal Patronage a load of guff?

User avatar
ColinC
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:05 pm
Location: Derbyshire

Post by ColinC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:40 pm

I fear that thickmick, if he exists, may have had a dose to much of a popular seasonal beverage!

The more sensible members will appreciate the role that patronage such as this plays in furthering the aims of the organisation and extending its credibility in the machine and organisations of the State in which we operate. For that reason it should be welcomed, not sniped at.

Does that count as an opinion?
018841
Colin Cheese

merlin
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:02 pm

Post by merlin » Fri Dec 31, 2010 10:24 am

Royal patronage is a great asset. Recognized by all in authority in the establishment and something that small organisations etc could never afford if we lived in any other country.
roger breckell

Ian Melville
Posts: 1001
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 7:21 pm

Post by Ian Melville » Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:27 pm

Why had ThickMick been allowed to post under a false name, then stand back and watch the fireworks? Hall mark of a Troll. Mods have jumped on people for lesser crimes. :D

Mod has jumped on him!

Post Reply